i can just see bill clinton there, soon to be joined by evan bayh...and maybe even dennis kucinich, who should definitely choose wines over drinks with olives in them.
the narcissism and self-congratulatory nature of all of this...
dont these people feel guilty drinking five hundred dollar bottles of wine, when the whole world is especially, watching them?
dont they care at all, even in public, what they look like, and the messages that they give?
i think it is really heartbreaking, what happens to people that are so intoxicated and driven by money and power....and especially when these are the people who make the decisions that affect every one of us.
i just cant help but think about the contrasts in the world, when i read this.
i cant help but mention this. just before i read this article, i was thinking about a little girl in the shelter where i work, who saw a car leaving, as she looked out of the gate.
she said, "i wonder if they have a home that they are driving to..or if they have a pass to go out somewhere."
and then, i think of this drunken mess, of the rich and powerful.
for people who think, the world is a comedy.
for people who feel, the world is a tragedy.
Clough was apparently working on the recommendation of Richard Kurin, undersecretary for history, art and culture. Complaints had been lodged by two powerful Republican congressmen, neither of whom had seen the video.
Clough's rash decision blew up in the Smithsonian's face. The Assn. of Art Museum Directors released a stern rebuke. A sharp editorial in the New York Times called the removal "absurd." A Washington Post critic argued for Clough's resignation.
Two big foundations issued a public moratorium on future Smithsonian funding, while others who contributed money to the privately underwritten show are known to be furious. Art museums and galleries around the country -- and even in Europe -- lined up to present the censored video. Last week the Museum of Modern Art went even further, acquiring the work for its permanent collection.
The Town Hall event is Clough's first public appearance since the censorship took place. An e-mail from a Smithsonian spokesman said that the secretary would "touch on" the issue in his talk and meet briefly with press afterward. Both gestures suggest we shouldn't expect a full accounting of what happened in the internal decision-making process -- or why.
That's disappointing. His defense of his actions on Tuesday -- "I think I made the right decision" -- makes matters worse. What the secretary actually needs to say when he "touches on" the controversy can be simply stated: "I screwed up."
Speculation has been rife that the decision was a blundered defensive measure, taken in the immediate aftermath of midterm elections that saw conservative Republicans assume control of the House of Representatives. Small agencies such as the Corp. for Public Broadcasting forecast a fight over federal appropriations. Expect the same for the Smithsonian.
Thirty million annual visitors might love going to its 19 museums, most of them free; but anyone who thinks appeasement will prevent an assault from the right on already modest cultural budgets is naive in the extreme. And a defensive measure that alienates supportive centrist and liberal constituencies is just plain dumb.
The Smithsonian's dilemma was ginned up by a single source: the Catholic League, which New York Times columnist Frank Rich has aptly described as "a right-wing publicity mill with no official or financial connection to the Catholic Church." Wojnarowicz's video partly laments widespread official apathy early in the AIDS epidemic and uses a crucifix as a specific symbol of general Christian indifference. The Catholic League called it anti-Christian, but the symbol is in fact more correctly described as anti-Catholic League and its ilk.
Here's why: William Donohue, the $400,000-a-year head of the organization, and L. Brent Bozell III, who is on the league's advisory board, are ardent anti-gay activists. So are House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor, who called for the censorship. Whether or not Clough, his undersecretary Kurin or others at the Smithsonian were aware that they were tailoring historical scholarship to quiet ideological opposition is just one among many unanswered questions.
Yet, it certainly looks that way. And there is reason to believe skittishness led the secretary to act in haste.
Ben Davis, a reporter for the website Artinfo.com, unearthed a 2006 case at Georgia Tech, where Clough was president just prior to taking the Smithsonian post. Clough and the school were sued by a conservative Christian legal association over a gay rights issue.
Among the claimed offenses: By mandating a hospitable environment on campus for lesbian and gay students, Davis wrote, Georgia Tech policy came under fire because it "discriminated against religions promoting anti-gay views and favored religions that preached tolerance." Donohue and Bozell were making a similar complaint about the Smithsonian's hospitable environment.
At the school, Clough reached a settlement with the plaintiffs. Perhaps he thought that's what he was also doing when the National Portrait Gallery was being bullied.
If so, he is mistaken. Clough erred by choosing censorship, throwing gasoline onto a brush fire.
Backing down to bullies never works. What works is reporting bullies to the authorities -- in this case, the authorities being the American public. There are diplomatic ways to do that, but the secretary didn't even try. Apparently, he won't be trying at Town Hall, either.
Now, almost two months later, the secretary is weakly defending his administrative error. The agenda for the Smithsonian Board of Regents' Jan. 31 meeting includes the censorship fiasco, but much of it will take place behind closed doors in executive session. If Clough thinks he made the right call, then he's merely digging a deeper hole.
--Christopher Knight
@twitter.com/KnightLAT
Photo: Smithsonian Secretary G. Wayne Clough; Credit: Anne Cusack/Los Angeles Times
marcincanoe
crystalclear
lovinthecows
geoatillo
eslebt
futurefunk
eufleabag
kurdeem
jasontongrulz
beyoncesgurl
cutietooti
xtiggerz
amegada
drakesmalice
anyaangie
lionessmom
dxyitffliak
ashtonwakelin
No comments:
Post a Comment